SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: RetiredNow who wrote (542276)1/9/2010 1:11:50 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) of 1575761
 
>> Even then, there was very high support for Iraq in the first year. But with the screw ups and failures, support has wained considerably.

But what OUGHT to matter is public opinion at the time the war starts. Because while the public has the ability to walk away from a war a year in, a president generally doesn't have that option without massive adverse consequences for the country.

I heard Rove talking about this today -- the Democrats who supported the Iraq War going in then flipped when it started going badly -- how they harmed the nation. And he's exactly right.

People like Jay Rockefeller, who supported the war based on all the intel GWB had, then when it got bad, he talked about GWB "taking us to war based on lies". That statement was an act of treason. There were no lies, there were mistakes. And the damage he did to our nation was immeasurable.

I feel the same way about the soldiers who released the Abu Ghraib photos. They were responsible for an untold number of deaths and their actions were treason as far as I'm concerned. If something like this happened during WWII I suspect they would have been dealt with harshly by others in their platoon.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext