Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: RetiredNow who wrote (542862)	1/11/2010 2:51:31 PM
From: jlallen	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 1574489

Wrong. You would not attack NK because they already had nukes. You would not resort to attacking Iran (at that time) becuase they did not have nukes yet and they had shown no proppensity to use WMD. Iraq had no nukes but was trying to acquire them, had shown a willingness to use WMD and was in violation of the '91 ceasefire agreement, including shooting at US and British airmen patrolling the no fly zone. One size does not fit all.....and of course part of the reason Bush decided to invade Iraq was to insure the free flow of oil from the ME....the free flow of oil is what drives the global economy. Sh's past history of aggression could not be ignored. J.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next