Good morning people. I thought I'd try and swing around the tone of the
conversation lately to something a little more sedate (and relevant). FYI, This is
the latest post from the C Oppendahl e-mailing list regarding the
E-data case in New York.
"A telephonic hearing was held on September 6, 1996 in the New York
Case. The chief topic of this hearing was the sufficiency of E-Data's
(IGE's) 264-page report. At the hearing, a schedule was set for a
supplemental submission by E-Data (IGE) to be filed no later than
November 8. Defendants are to provide their comments, if any,as to
the sufficiency of the supplemental submission by November 18. A
hearing will take place on Tuesday, December 3 at 10:00 AM in Judge
Jones' courtroom.
---
Carl Oppedahl, Oppedahl & Larson, patent law firm patents.com
has hundreds of pages of answers to frequently asked questions on
patent, copyright, and trademark law"
So, what do you think ? Only lawyers could deem a 264 page submission to
be insufficient. It would be kind of interesting to find out the
substance of the teleconference, and why the original document was
lacking in content. I'll be waiting to hear e-data's version of the events
with some interest.
Durro |
