SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (543113)1/12/2010 3:05:51 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) of 1575317
 
"YOU are the guy who claimed CT was a "simple" explanation for Gibbs claim that climate change is evidence by the snow outside"

Not exactly. Like your Puget Sound example, you are putting up another straw man.

In addition, you are conflating two different concepts here. Weather and climate are not the same thing. CT is not an appropriate model for climate. Climate for the most part isn't chaotic. However, weather is. And hence, a perfect candidate for CT.

"So, now, you roll CT as an explanation for Gibb's remarks which are OBVIOUSLY absurd."

I can't help it if you are confused. Let me try to explain. The hypothesis is that the climate is changing. That influences a chaotic system, the weather. Enough change, and a chaotic system, as modeled by CT, will eventually shift from one strange attractor to another. Typically what happens is that the chaotic system will start hitting extremes until the new strange attractor falls into range, and then it will settle at the new strange attractor. It really isn't all that complicated or insidious.

"But you can't come here spewing bullshit and expect everyone to stand in line nodding their heads in agreement. "

Projecting, again i-node. This is precisely what you do. I don't expect people to just agree. Which is why I provide links and keywords so others can check up on me.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext