SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: one_less who wrote (82140)1/12/2010 5:57:44 PM
From: Greg or e  Read Replies (1) of 82486
 
I thought you said that you would not discuss Christian doctrine with me: Was that another lie? I don't know why you are now claiming your self admitted mis characterization of Christianity ("But I wouldn't do that because I think it is bigoted, hateful, and wrong") is now factually correct. You seem very confused. You have admitted that What Mr Duncan said was not only factually correct but also generally accepted. No such thing could be ever be said for your "bigoted, hateful, and wrong", (and I might add illogical) rant.

"If I said the Christian doctrine focuses, even requires devotes to consider as central to the religion a ceremony where virtual blood and flesh are consumed, I would not be wrong."

You would indeed be wrong. The charge that Christians are cannibals was issued and refuted oh, about two thousand years ago. Jesus was obviously using a metaphor when He broke the bread and passed the cup. He was standing right there. When Jesus said "I am the door" I suspect you would be looking for hinges and a handle with such an obviously simplistic take on things. But just to show you how easy it is to refute such bizarre claims here is a link that does just that:
christianitytoday.com I could post dozens of others.

I could go on and expose the obvious fallacy in equating the USA with Christianity "the Christian country USA". Just because left wingers like you hate both equally does not make them equivalent to one another. Is that supposed to be one of your irrefutable generally accepted facts? Plllease...

Your presentation is nothing like Duncan's: NOTHING!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News