SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Greg or e who wrote (82161)1/14/2010 10:46:07 PM
From: Solon1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) of 82486
 
The best evidence shows that Flew was at the VERY MOST converted to an impersonal Deism. The Law of Parsimony does not even permit that conclusion.

However, it is irrelevant and of no interest. Another of your famous red herrings. CASE CLOSED!!

In 2007, Flew published a book titled There is a God, which was listed as having Roy Abraham Varghese as its co-author. "Shortly after the book was released, the New York Times published an article by religious historian Mark Oppenheimer, who stated that Varghese had been almost entirely responsible for writing the book, and that Flew was in a serious state of mental decline, having great difficulty remembering key figures, ideas, and events relating to the debate covered in the book.[4] His book praises several philosophers (like Brian Leftow, John Leslie and Paul Davies), but Flew failed to remember their work during Oppenheimer's interview. The article provoked a public outcry, in which atheist PZ Myers called Varghese "a contemptible manipulator."[23]

A further article by Anthony Gottlieb noted a strong difference in style between the passages giving Flew's biography, and those laying out the case for a god, with the latter including Americanisms such as "beverages", "vacation" and "candy". He came to the same conclusion as Oppenheimer, and stated that "Far from strengthening the case for the existence of God, [the book] rather weakens the case for the existence of Antony Flew".[24] Varghese replied with a letter disputing this view.
"

As to your "evidence":

"Jeffrey Shallit, a Computer Scientist and Mathematican, reviewed the Meyer's "significant misunderstandings of information theory."[48] His review concluded: "Meyer's claims about information are incoherent in places and wildly wrong in others. The people who have endorsed this book, from Thomas Nagel to Philip Skell to J. Scott Turner, uncritically accepting Meyer's claims about information and not even hinting that he might be wrong, should be ashamed."[48]

en.wikipedia.org

Not only that, GREG OR E. DNA has NOTHING to do with supporting tribal myths and stories about demons, angels, talking donkeys, and such. GET A LIFE, FELLA!!!

The universe and all of life are AWESOME studies. Leviticus and Joshua are NOT awesome studies! The Koran is NOT an awesome study! The Mormons and the Quakers and the thousands and thousands of others are NOT awesome studies!!

NOTHING IN DNA OR THE SUN OR THE MOON OR THE GAME OF TENNIS IS EVIDENCE FOR TALKING DONKEYS. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT???
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext