A US National Health Care System? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TimF who wrote (13125)	1/16/2010 6:35:16 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) of 42652

That's assuming the procedure or pill is a necessary or inherent part of their job. Yes, it does. As I pointed out upstream, I don't think it's an essential element of the job of an ER doc, which was longnshort's premise. I don't know what abortion pills have to do with ER work other than perhaps the occasional rape victim, in which case it should be easy enough to work around one's doctor's objection. So the premise is bogus, seems to me. Nonetheless, I took the premise for the sake of argument to point out the disconnect and "hypocrisy" on both sides. There are other complexities in the argument that I didn't bring up for the sake of simplicity. Smoke in bars and dispensing abortion pills have in common that they are both demands for workplace re-engineering to accommodate the employee but they have other aspects and relevant differences..

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next