SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Land Shark who wrote (27699)1/18/2010 3:24:38 PM
From: Maurice Winn2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 36917
 
What increase? <So what about the recent temperature increases in the past 100 years (with solar output staying constant)?>

Do you mean the 0.7 degrees which has been claimed? Not even 1 degree Celsius after 100 years of all-out carbon production and burning.

Also, you have obviously not checked the solar output over the last few hundred years including the last 100.

The sun's output has been on a high for decades. It's hardly surprising that things warm slightly with increased solar activity.

Now it's reducing to a more normal level as predicted by Mq the Marvelous a couple of years ago, and now by the "experts" who are catching up.

You got two things wrong in one sentence.

To make it clear.

1.....Earth has not warmed up as promised by the Global Alarmists. 0.7 deg C is not enough to melt butter let alone defrost the Arctic, Antarctica and Greenland.

2.....Sol's output varies a lot and has done since records began. There was the Medieval Warm Period. There was the Little Ice Age. There was the big ice age not long ago. Earth has been warming since the last glaciation, with a few ups and downs on the way.

Have a look at the sun's output as described by sun-spot cycles and you should be able to see it for yourself.

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext