SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: J.B.C. who wrote (343832)1/18/2010 5:35:12 PM
From: Alan Smithee  Read Replies (1) of 793986
 
I've been on that cruise ship and to that beach. I'm not sure why you would say that its wrong. Is it wrong for people that booked trips long ago to take their trips to Hawaii? How about those that booked their trips to Florida, should they cancel? The people on that ship booked long ago without knowledge of an earthquake. The ship provides an economy to the local area that is beneficial. It's about 100 miles from Port-Au Prince. Would it be better to bypass that area and not provide any benefit. In fact with knowledge on board, the people would probably be more than generous to the local folks.

It's the contrast of consumption and luxury on the ship with the total devastation nearby. Citing Hawaii or Florida is just a straw man. Certainly Carnival could have rerouted their ports of call. That's all.

I don't buy Lindy's argument about the locals who benefit from this ship. I doubt there is much of an economic benefit to the local economy by having a cruise ship anchored in a bay.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News