SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The New Qualcomm - write what you like thread.
QCOM 163.33-1.0%Nov 25 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Maurice Winn who wrote (9223)1/19/2010 4:43:34 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer  Read Replies (1) of 12235
 
Maurice, I always appreciate your interesting concepts. No exception here. While you may have some argument on CO2 emissions, they are easier to measure and control than particulates, mercury, other heavy metal and related emissions. Since other dangerous emissions often occur with CO2, a tax based on CO2 also can reduce dangerous, often cancer producing emissions.

I suppose I shouldn't be upset over a bit of global warming, since it reduces my fuel costs in this upstate New York area, whose winter temperatures match those in Moscow and Helsinki, though for a shorter period. But as a person with asthma, related in part to air quality, I think it is a good idea to have policies that encourage the reduction of whatever emissions lead to an increase in breathing problems. I do not think it is a good idea to let other countries do what they please, on the grounds that I or others with similar problems have no jurisdiction.

We're all more and more interdependent, no matter where we live or what work we do.

Art
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext