SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (25110)1/21/2010 8:27:42 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (3) of 103300
 
Re: "yes, both are acceptable to all courts, but that's NOT my point... they are two very different documents, how difficult is it to understand such a simple concept?"

Oh, that's not difficult to understand at all.

But the question becomes: "Different to WHO??????"

Obviously we already agree that they are NOT 'different' as far as the Courts are concerned. And not different as far as the rest of the government is concerned either. (Courts have ruled that "birth certificate" and "certificate of birth" are functionally the exact same thing, and accepted as exactly the same thing throughout all government....

So, since we are talking about government documents I mean... what the heck is the 'dif'?

It may be an important 'difference' to you, or to someone else, but isn't that a bit of a 'distinction without a meaning' since, as far as the government is concerned (and the documents are created for the purposes of government), there is no functional difference at all....
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News