2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 386.44

-0.2%

Dec 5 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: energyplay who wrote (60310)	1/23/2010 2:19:58 PM
From: Joe S Pack	Read Replies (1) of 218253

I hope you understand the implications fully. This country is already run by lobbyists and corporations. In case ..... Nowhere in the constitution the corporation was mentioned. But that was change by an "elite" Judge Marshall when he misinterpreted in 1819 in the case of "Dartmouth College v. Woodward" (http://www.ratical.org/corporations/Dartmouth.html) to grant corporations certain rights. No amendment has added this right to constitution. Since elite knew that they cannot get a real amendment if they ask common folks to vote for this privilege, they used Marshall to get this right. It is fundamentally flawed as it diminishes individuals' rights and allows a pyramid scheme of rights in US. For example, an ordinary common folk has certain rights but when he/she works for a corporation he/she has accrued additional rights. So if one works for multiple corporations he/she will have more "effective rights" than an ordinary folk. Thus this whole thing is a joke in the land of republic. Lot of people will live ignorant of some basic things/rights as long as they are fed by corporate media.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next