Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (273478)	1/25/2010 12:55:07 PM
From: SARMAN	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Maybe so Are they both in violation? It is simple Hawk, YES or NO. But Hizballah was the CLEAR AGGRESSOR and the onus is So now the onus is on AGGRESSOR. So the onus is on the Jews to make peace with Palestinians. Right? You a hypocrite that speaks from both side of his mouth. Until Lebanon is able to do that, they can only be considered a failed state.. Really, was that news to you? Alas, we back and support failed states. A failed state that, btw, is STILL AT WAR WITH ISRAEL and has pledged to be the last to make peace with the Jews. So is Syria, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia etc. big deal, the only peace that Israel needs is when it kills Palestinians and steal their land is to be left in peace. After all the onus is on the aggressor, right?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next