SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Winter in the Great White North

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Stephen O who wrote (7601)1/26/2010 12:00:25 PM
From: teevee   of 8273
 
Obviously nothing of a material nature. No doubt at least a few major mining companies have put Imperial Metals in their rollodex. It takes a lot of capital to develop a new mine, especially underground block caving. Any mine development financing that involved equity would put Imperial Metals in play as it would dilute control below 50%, so I believe that option is the least likely. In my opinion, it is most likely that mine development of Red Chris will be done by giving up a percentage of concentrate flow for development capital ( III developed Huckleberry and Mt Polley mines by giving up a percentage of concentrate flow for mine development money). If you have been following major mine and exploration developments over the last 20-30 years, you may recall that RTP put up expansion money for FCX's Grasberg deposit in exchange for a percentage of future concentrate flow. Since then, RTP has become involved in other deep high grade copper deposits (Oyu Tolgoi, Pebble, and Resolution).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext