SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cogito who wrote (129354)1/27/2010 9:50:17 AM
From: Katelew  Read Replies (2) of 542055
 
It becomes a vicious cycle.

Yes, but it doesn't spiral down forever. An equilibrium point is reached, and it will be reached faster if the government doesn't try to preserve every job.

Another reason is that the government has no way of really knowing whether or not a company is well-managed or not when it tries to prop them all up. Strong companies tend to survive recessions on their own because they have prepared for the inevitable downturns. They have money set aside, or have hired well, or have solid inventory contol systems in place, etc. So to blame a business failure entirely on a recession is mistaken.

Actually recessions serve to clean house....weed out the weak and redistribute assets to more efficient use. They spawn innovation, too, and often entirely new industries and technology come about from the crisis management that takes place. Just this morning I read about two new policies Caterpillar will adopt to help its suppliers more easily obtain bank credit.

Perhaps the main reason to avoid government intervention is simply that it prolongs the process of weeding out the weak. Unemployment insurance runs out. Better to get the process over with quickly so rehiring can start.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext