SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (40768)1/28/2010 6:10:44 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 71588
 
Ain't that all exactly what I argued?

Yes and no. The part you quoted was what you argued, but you cut off the quote in the middle of the sentence.

The whole sentence was

"The ideal scenario (in terms of likelihood of getting the amendment passed and ratified, not in other ways) for such an amendment is if you get a massive deficit disaster and fiscal crisis, then after that sanity gets restored and the budget draws to or near balance, but people are still very worried that the massive deficits could happen again and think it would cause another horrible crisis if they let that happen."

You only argued the beginning part of the sentence.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News