SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (129909)2/1/2010 6:44:02 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 542214
 
You say "speak" to a dog and the dog barks. All the parties seem to think it's speech.

Funny.

You say "speak" to the dog, and it recognizes the sound that indicates you want it to bark. It doesn't know the meaning of the term beyond "she wants me to bark", if it even knows that much and isn't just operating under its conditioning. You could make the phrase "corporation", or "don't speak", and get the same response if that is how you trained the dog.

If they don't have standing, then their speech isn't protected.

The amendment as written is a limitation of congress, only indirectly a protection of rights for those with standing. Congress has no power to do some specific thing whoever or whatever it applies to.

If you think that corporations have standing because the people who inhabit them have standing, then brooks have standing because people swimming in them have standing.

The argument is pretty much a non-sequitur. The people in the brook are not part of the brook and don't operate collectively as a brook.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext