International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (24123)	11/4/1997 12:14:00 AM
From: Theo	Read Replies (1) of 35569

<<Why does IPM let the SH stew like this when minimal $ would let many rest easy, and attract new investors.>> Bill, First of all, minimum $ is far from what world class third party verification costs. Second of all, Why would you have them verify anything unless it was meaningfull to mining BRX? Whats meaningfull? 1=How much gold and platinum can be extracted from a ton of dirt ( not a formula to extrapolate the numbers, but really use that much dirt) using a fire assay method? 2=How much gold and platinum can be estimated by drilling toward the edges of the property? 3=Whats the cost of building a mine, and cost per ton to mine it? Not only did IPM allready do this, but they have hired a different world class engineering firm to verify each point, so NOBODY can say they didn't do the best damn job in the world. Its this news you ask about that we are waiting for. Rumor has it that the numbers are in and the lawyers are reading the papers to make sure the wording is proper. What do you think is possible to improve the situation right now, that is legal? All I see coming is CHECKMATE. Theo

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next