2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 368.31

+0.6%

Nov 7 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: koan who wrote (60853)	2/8/2010 6:31:54 PM
From: energyplay	Read Replies (2) of 217638

Prop 13 was and is simplistic and causes a number of problems - However, the state of California has been able to get revenue from income and sales taxes to generate per capita revenue close to that of Massachusetts and New York. all 2007 numbers per capita state government revenue New York $3,250 Massachusetts $3,195 California $3,154 Winters are milder in most of California, and this will reduce the cost of government for building heating, snow removal, and road repair. >>> What does California state government need to do beyond what New York and Massachusetts do ? <<< The answer is nothing. Unless you think California should move even further down the road to socialism and attempts at wealth redistribution than New York and Massachusetts. California should live within it means. By the way, what do you mean by "social system" ? Would you say Texas has a good social system ?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next