SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Procept (PRCT): 50% rise on high volume. Why?
PRCT 31.91+2.0%Nov 7 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Douglas who wrote (279)11/4/1997 8:16:00 AM
From: Douglas  Read Replies (1) of 455
 
It seems that Ultrafem may have deep problems (burn rate of $30 million a year!)

The Daily Trouble (Archive)

Oct 28, 1997

Ultrafem, Inc.
(Nasdaq:UFEM - news)
Phone: 212-446-1400
Price (10/27/97): $6

HOW DID IT FIND TROUBLE?

One of the great stock winners profiled by Peter Lynch in his first book One Up on Wall Street was Tambrands Inc.
(recently acquired by Procter & Gamble). When Ultrafem brought its alternative Instead product to market, there was the
promise of grabbing significant market share from conventional tampons. The stock rose as high as $36 per share after
coming public at $10.

Then reality struck in the form of a slower-than-expected ramp up in sales and widening losses that were greater than
expected. Short sellers were vocal in their position that this was an overvalued single product company. This combination of
poor financial performance and negative perception spelled trouble for Ultrafem shareholders.

BUSINESS DESCRIPTION

Ultrafem makes feminine products based on SoftCup technology. Its only commercially available product is the Instead
product, which is an alternative to tampons and sanitary napkins. The SoftCup technology also shows some promise in
contraception and in the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases.

FINANCIAL FACTS

Income Statement
12-month sales: $3.5 million
12-month income: ($36.7 million)
12-month EPS: ($5.08)
Profit Margin: N/A
Market Cap: $50 million

Balance Sheet
Cash: $20.8 million
Current Assets: $28.3 million
Current Liabilities: $15 million
Long-term Debt: $0.7 million

Ratios
Price-to-earnings: N/A
Price-to-sales: 14.3

HOW COULD YOU HAVE SEEN IT COMING?

The potential for trouble at Ultrafem was nicely outlined on the Ultrafem message board on America Online. While some
product users gave favorable reviews, the availability of the product was questioned and others hinted that the product was
not as widely accepted as anticipated.

Business Week included the stock on a list of stocks to short last December.

A look at Zacks or First Call might have dissuaded a Foolish investor because no analysts project profit for the company for
the foreseeable future. A sure road to trouble is to invest in money losing single-product companies. Even an optimist looking
at price/sales relationships would have found that the company was trading at over 30 times sales at the beginning of the year.
This stock had high-risk written all over it.

WHERE TO FROM HERE?

First Call earnings estimates expect losses out to fiscal year 1999. The company has missed estimates the past couple of
quarters and losses have been even wider than expected. The stock is still priced at over 14 times sales. In addition, the
company is burning a lot of cash and has been required to continue to raise capital through the issuance of shares. Ultrafem
burned over $30 million in operations last year alone.

Even though the stock is selling for only 20% of its peak price, it still isn't cheap by any measure, and the company is still
relying on a single product.

In this Fool's opinion, there will be ample time to make a buck if the Instead product is a success. Remember, when Peter
Lynch found Tambrands, the product had been on the market for almost a decade.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext