SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Paracelsian Inc (PRLN)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (419)9/7/1996 5:27:00 PM
From: richard davis   of 4342
 
Hey SSB! I have been offwire, hurricane Fran...

I read all the post, and wow!! You all have been busy! Great reading. I have been catching up for the last hour, and can only understand part of this.

Question: Is PRLN still in good shape? First, I agree with you, the conference in november is pure Hype, as I can gather no evidence that it is one of the biggies. I was also concerned about the comment regarding the clinical testing of 355. Are they able to proceed with testing, or have patients converted there therapies to the latest one put out by Merk? I also am not sure I understand the comment about toxcicity of 355 aqnd 27,1. Are they more toxic because of the levels needed in humans vs the testing in the lab?

I guess I am struggling to communicate right now, but in your opinion, is PRLN still looking good with respect to these drugs? I am going to go back through the postings and read some of those analysis on herbs (of which i still believe in them. When Melatonion came out, GNC could not keep the shelves stocked. Although not an herb, it was a natural remedy for sleeping disorders).

Folks, i got to tell you. I have learned more about PRLN from this board over the last hour, than I have from any other source. KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK!!!!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext