eh hemm ...
As far as projection again you turn every disagreement into a personal attack, that's just what you do.....
....cheap ... snide catty remarks ,
I'm starting to think you are in need of some help, that goes beyond just correcting your mistakes and pointing out your flawed logic. I'll see if I can break this down for you.
-----------------
1. The above bolded clip is classic projection.
-----------------------
"You represented one aspect of a presentation as being the entire argument. That was a misrepresentation.
2. No I didn't, now you are just being dishonest and blatantly so. I've already said I have no problem with the way he argued his points, while drawing a conclusion at the end that the other side's arguement fails for a reason ....
"This is because Jesus Christ, the Alpha and Omega of all reality, is given no place at all.”
You may not like that he drew such a conclusion, although I've no idea know why you want to call it a throw away line. I do know you go into a horrible tail spin of defensive personal attacks and false allegations when ever I mention it ... which is very odd behavior. The fact is I haven't misrepresented anything and I have gone over board to clarify that fact for you. You repeating the allegation is simply to your further dishonor.
-------------
You: "I stand by everything I said in that post and have explained why that is the case. "
No you don't...
3. So you say but I asked you to stand behind the following statement by providing evidence I had posted something nonsensical. You, however, provided no evidence, nor did you apologise. Just what is it you consider to be the conduct of one who is standing behind their statements anyway?
You: ”The second sentence of your post is nonsense. Are you complaining that Jesus did not say that He was the Alpha and the Omega? He surely did and those very words are quoted as being said by Jesus in the Bible.”
Me: Really, I didn’t know that. Would you mind posting the chapter and vs where Jesus is quoted using those exact words… “the Alpha and Omega of all reality.” I would prefer that it isn't one where it is not clear whether the statement is referencing the Father or the Son. Or if you are mistaken, a simple apology would suffice.
---
You: you are doing a drive-by slam. You make snide comments and then run away.”
Me: What snide comment? I posted the text from a Christian instructional sight and asked the obvious questions about how you reconcile that with the alpha Omega comment made by your author. If you are uncomfortable with the question that says more about you and your faith claims than anything else. Snide is certainly not an accurate descriptor.
(Do you recall your response, your standing up for that)
or to the following...
You: >>“Your posts about Christianity are dripping with condescension and passive aggressiveness.”
Me: I’ve made no condescending or passive aggressive remarks about Christianity. You might say I am not respectful of you, or the works by the authors you submit, but that is an entirely different issue since you nor they have attempted in any way to earn my respect, quite the contrary.
(You didn't STAND UP or BEHIND the comment, you suggested I am ignorant with regards to Christian Principles and so unworthy of a response from you.)
--- |
