Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Greg or e who wrote (82376)	2/13/2010 5:04:13 PM
From: one_less	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) of 82486

You: >>>He surely did and those very words are quoted as being said by Jesus in the Bible.>>> Get that? iIt is nonsense to suggest that Jesus did not claim to be the Alpha and the Omega Me: "Really, I didn’t know that. Would you mind posting the chapter and vs where Jesus is quoted using those exact words… “the Alpha and Omega of all reality.” I would prefer that it isn't one where it is not clear whether the statement is referencing the Father or the Son. Or if you are mistaken, a simple apology would suffice." ------------------ You: "You are simply displaying your ignorance of both the bible and Christianity and your request for the exact phrasing is a sad attempt to score more of those cheap points that you seem so fond of. In fact Jesus claimed far more than that He claimed to be the creator of all existence." There is nothing cheap, nonsense-acle, or ignorant about responding to blatant allegations and attacks from you in a logical and specific manner. You've now provided a text from revelations, although you weren't even man enough to admit that, which is not part of the apostolic account of the life and words spoken by Jesus, where Jesus is sometimes directly quoted. It does not justify your attacks on me even if some scholars may want to attribute it to Jesus. In the Old testament and the new the term 'The Lord God' is not used to identify Jesus so it is very out of order to use that one text in that way. People commonly referred to people of higher status as lord and to people of righteous character as Son of God, just as Jesus did reference the righteous as children of our father and evil people as the children of the Devil. Those are facts not debate points. The text you came up with does not specifically reference Jesus directly or indirectly by context, another fact. You really should seek help for what ever it is that makes you lash out at people who engage you in simple discussion. Surely even you recognize it doesn't further your Christian cause don't you?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next