I agree that Ozone cleansing systems for food processors is interesting, but I still haven't heard REAL facts that support why a company will change their current cleaning process unless forced. And from the sound of the USA Today article, radiation is getting a lot more support from the government.
As a prospective investor, I would like to hear which companies in Europe and Asia are using Ozone, if any. If I remember correctly, I read posts on this thread claiming Ozone was already in use overseas. Or, what is the capital expense of setting up an Ozone system at a food processor and is it less expensive then current methods? If it is less expensive, how long will it take for a food processor to recoup their capital investment by switching to Ozone vs Chlorine? These are very important facts that every investor in this company should understand because if a company is not forced into switching or cann't save a substantial amount of money, why should they switch to Ozone?
I have read all the research information on this thread and still don't find HARD FACTS to support all of the cheerleading going on. Don't get me wrong, I think enthusiasim is great, but if it can't be substantiated, what good does it do to other (future) investors like myself that buy stock based on real knowledge and facts vs speculation and good wishes.
I hope someone comes to the table with answers because this is the second or third time I have asked these questions from this thread and NO ONE RESPONDS! If Ozone is as good as everyone on this thread says, than lets hear more facts versus speculation on how much money everyone thinks they're going to make when "HUGE CONTRACTS ARE ANNOUNCED".
Thanks in advance to anyone willing to answer my questions ....John |
