SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: RetiredNow who wrote (552886)3/3/2010 10:25:51 AM
From: HPilot  Read Replies (1) of 1573147
 
But I understand your sentiment if you are talking purely from a tax standpoint. I didn't get married for the legal benefits, though, nor did I care about the tax disadvantages. I married my wife for one reason only. I wanted to spend the rest of my life with her and wanted to make a binding public commitment to that effect. I would have done it even if both of us were incapable of having children.

You do not have to get a marriage license to get married under many religions. You filed for the licence because you thought you should, or your church required it. Even if incapable of having children you would have to be legally married to adopt.
Most people incapable of having children are not aware of this when they get married.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News