SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: PROLIFE who wrote (13857)3/4/2010 7:20:19 AM
From: Alighieri5 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) of 42652
 
Tim pretty well summed up what I would have said, except I might add that it was just a couple weeks ago that the Prime Minister of Canada came to the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA to get his heart worked over....guess that socialized medicine in Canada ain't that great, huh? And....from the stories I hear England's socialized medicine pretty much sucks too.

What does that prove? People used to go to South Africa for heart transplants back in the 60s. You folks refuse to understand the essentials of the debate...it is possible and even likely to receive excellent health care in the US...no one disputes this fact. The problem is that, to many people, this level of care is not accessible nor affordable, and, to far too many, health care is only administered through an emergency room visit. It's all about socio-economic standing. Sure...a cancer patient can receive world class treatment at Sloan Kettering, and the Mayo clinic is among the most advanced and best run facility in the nation, but equivalent care is not available to millions of Americans. It is the prime reason the WHO finds our system 37th in the world.

The system is in dire need of reform...

Al
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext