SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Greg or e who wrote (28202)3/8/2010 12:45:11 PM
From: one_less1 Recommendation  Read Replies (3) of 28931
 
"I don't claim to speak for God less."

I didn't say you claim to speak for God Greg. You didn't even need to bring it up. It is a forgone conclusion that you would deny such a thing. The record, however, speaks for itself, you have spoken for God.

" If speaking against what you consider to be false is a crime then you are just as guilty as I am."

I'm guilty as charged in this case, there is a difference however. I don't hide behind religionistic jargon and dogma as a shield, I base my comments on reason and principle. I don't levy irrelevant dismissive labels to drag in uncalled for taintings of simple assertions. You would probably say my use of the term 'religionist' does that, if so I would disagree. I have explained my use of that term and don't consider every God fearing religious person to be a religionist. Only people who use religion in a way that qualifies the term according to it's given definitions. Ehhh ... so?

"The only difference is that I recognize that's what I'm doing and you do not."

False allegation.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext