2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 368.31

+0.6%

Nov 7 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Webster Groves who wrote (61787)	3/10/2010 12:50:06 PM
From: energyplay	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 217637

Note the UK already has the Falklands, they don't have to take it back like last time. Argentina would need to buy lots of equipment to invade, several $ Billion. The UK already almost everything they need, they just need to move some more kit to the Falklands and dig in. Attacking a motivated and trained defense force that has precision guided weapons when your own logistic train is stretched and vulnerable and you don't control the ocean (submarines) and sometimes don't control the air is an elaborate form of suicide. Look at what it took to take even minor islands in the Pacific during WWII. I expect the additional cost to fortify and garrison the Falklands at about 1 Billion per year, the oil could be worth much more.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next