SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Biota

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: A.J. Mullen who wrote (10)11/4/1997 8:37:00 PM
From: Craig McNeill  Read Replies (2) of 46
 
I'm just starting research on the company, and have noticed the
recent price @$6/ADR which is down substantially from the summer
highs of about $11. Much of this I'm sure is attributable to the
market collapse of recent, but I also wonder how much can be
attributed the stock getting ahead of itself at $11 to begin with.
It doesn't appear to me that revenues will start to flow until 1999,
if the company keeps on track with the Glaxo project. I have no
doubts that it will given Glaxo's reputation and commitmements. But
even then, Biota is entitled to only 6% of global revs. Outside of
the flu products, there doesn't appear to be products in the pipeline
transitioning to phase II or III status.

There is also going to be a share dilution, if I understand
correctly, of an additional 6.6m shares. This shouldn't be a problem
theoretically if the new capital proportionally contributes to
shareholder value.

Please don't get me wrong, I'm not putting Biota down. At first
glance it looks like good value at a $130-140m market cap. I'm just
trying to understand it. Obviously, there is a lot of intellectual
property being valued in BTA stock and I want to get comfortable with
it. Good luck to all. cm
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext