Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 179.02

+3.7%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jim Mullens who wrote (90274)	3/16/2010 7:45:27 AM
From: mindy1968	7 Recommendations Read Replies (2) of 196481

Jim Mullens - First, thanks for all your hard work and most informative posts! But you seem to see Q's future with rose colored glasses. I hope you are right. Maybe we can pass those glasses on to Bill Keitel. If what you presented will come to pass, why did Keitel reduce guidance by a pittance for 2010? Does he have a crystal ball that he knows to the penny what Q will earn in 2010? Was it just a Freudian slip? Was it intentional? What will the 2010 earnings be? IMHO what Bill Keitel did was inexcusable. PJ did a good job at the ASM to cry to crawl out of the hole that Bill Keitel dug for us shareholders. TIA

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next