SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mishedlo who wrote (109618)3/16/2010 10:59:41 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (2) of 116555
 
Misconceptions about Money and Velocity

Admittedly I'm probably going to venture a bit out of my league in addressing the Equation of Exchange theory, but I'm going to give it a shot.

If money is a commodity and it's supply results in inflation (according to Rothbard), why are we experiencing deflationary pressures?

You're predicting strong deflationary pressures, right? But Money supply has increased dramatically, yet we're not seeing inflation. If anything, it's the opposite.

But I can understand the concept of the velocity of multiple exchanges, using mutually agreed upon stores of value, equating to a gross domestic product.

But let's suppose that we hypothetically eliminate all financial exchanges/transactions and just measure the amount of cash. Without velocity of exchanges being involved, is it not required to measure GDP as the available supply of money?

Example.. Say there's $5 Trillion on deposit and everyone suddenly demanded cash to hoard and never made another exchange for a different good or service. Would not GDP then forever be $5 Trillion until people recommenced exchanging commodity for commodity, therefore re-establishing exchange value?

Now.. what if some of that money supply is stored as gold, or any other non-consumable commodity and is never exchanged again once obtained?

Or is it possible that money supply that is stored and is never exchanged loses it's value because it's rate of exchange no longer be quantified via a barter transaction (monetary commodity for other good/service), therefore achieving price discovery for both commodities?

Admittedly the scenario is absurd, but it calls into question traditional GDP theory, as well as Rothgard's Gross Private Product (GPP) and Private Product Remaining (PPR) theories.

Thus, it's possible that all the theories need to be revisited?

I know.. rather presumptuous of me to suggest such an idea.

But Rothgard asserts that GPP is all economic exchange minus economic activity involving government funding. And if suddenly all private economic activity halts and people sit on their cash, then would not GPP equate to available money supply being hoarded?

Hawk
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext