SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: one_less who wrote (556099)3/19/2010 10:31:42 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) of 1578531
 
"Sure it's factual. I am a completely honest person and you are not. "

Let's see. I have pointed out numerous lies you have made. You haven't been able to point to a single one I have made. Yet you are honest and I am not.

How does that work?

"You have attempted to make a case for that on several occasions"

If I haven't made the case, you have been able to dispute it. Ignoring it doesn't dispute it. Making baseless claims doesn't either. Wild claims about your supposed honesty, same.

I think I have made my case. You can't show that I haven't.

" I have not attempted to deceive you,"

Sure you have, _less. You have made claims that were counter-factual. And I have proven that was the case. Now granted, you could be so delusional that you believe the crap you make up. But I am not sure that is any better.

"You may have pointed out cases where your opinion differed from mine "

What is it with you wingnuts? There is a difference between facts and opinions. I have pointed out where you claimed I posted one thing when, in fact, I posted something else. Whether or not my original post was an opinion doesn't matter. You claiming I posted something I provably didn't is empirical.

You are entitled to your own opinions. You are not entitled to your own facts.

"You've claimed I lied about boycotting the thread."

Look. Announcing a boycott, flouncing out of here in a huff, and then quietly returning a short time later certainly opens you to the charge of lying. And rightly so. You obviously wanted everyone to ignore that you went off to sulk. And expected to come back without comment. So you either lied about the boycott or lied about it being one.

"You wanted to continue arguing about it, I did not. "

Of course you didn't. You had nothing. You made your claims, I showed your claims weren't anywhere close to the truth and you kept making the same claims. That shows a distinct lack of character. Or a disconnect from reality.

Again, you can have your own opinions. You cannot have your own facts.

"Perhaps you didn't feel like you had won after all was said and done and in your mind that makes you a loser, which is understandably unacceptable."

Projection.

Again.

"What you label or call honesty is one thing, authentic honesty is another. "

Well, _less, given that I have shown you aren't authentically honest, yet you claim to be, this is yet another case of projection.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext