SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (42267)3/20/2010 5:26:58 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) of 71588
 
Checking the Math on Health Care

March 19, 2010, 7:21 pm
By TOBIN HARSHAW

opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com

=============================================================

... Also, this one added comment, (listed as comment #5), down from the "comments" portion at the bottom of this one article, that seems fairly important to note:

Tobin, you got a big fact wrong. You claim that $53 billion of the savings for the reconciliation bill in the CBO analysis comes from social security revenues, but it doesn't. Table 1, page 6 of the report, footnote C below the table clearly states that NO SOCIAL SECURITY REVENUES are included in any of the $53 billion in off-budget savings. They attribute the $53 billion in off budget savings only as coming from affects of the legislation relating to the post office. Footnote 2 on page 2 also clearly states that the reconciliation act states, by law, that all social security gains must be transferred to the social security trust fund. Even if you are quoting someone else, by not correcting their BIG error you are misleading your readers. Don't take my word for it, read the facts here:

cbo.gov
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext