SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Alighieri who wrote (15398)3/25/2010 12:06:20 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 42652
 
When bush took office he started life as POTUS with a ~200B surplus and the CBO's estimated that we were looking at a 10 year surplus of approx $5T...when he left office the national debt had been doubled from approx $5T to more than $10T

Liberal reality. Clinton's projected "surpluses" were money in the bank.

...so he effectively spent $10T through tax cuts, deficits, 2 wars

But it had nothing to do with the collapse of an economic bubble which GWB inherited, or the 9/11 attack on the heart of our financial district, or the worst natural disaster suffered by our country in years.

and a drug bill that will cost nearly as much as the current health care bill...not one cent of that was funded...not ONE.

This, of course, indicates just how stupid you are, Al. Medicare Part D has come in massively under budget every year thus far and likely WOULD HAVE come in at 300B over its first 10 years had the Ds not screwed it up by eliminating any element of personal responsibility in the program.

Part D will now become one more liberal train wreck of a government program. And you're not going to be able to blame it on Bush. IT IS THE DEMOCRATS PROBLEM NOW.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext