Imperial Metals (IPM.T) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Imperial Metals (IPM.T)

IPM 1.890

+0.5%

Nov 17 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Italian Investor who wrote (276)	3/28/2010 11:54:47 AM
From: refugee investor	Read Replies (1) of 1366

Hope you feel better. Andrew Bolton is an English Peter Lynch type, no doubt a whiz, but I do not like the fact that adds for his fund pop up all over the place, for instance on the FT site when you are looking up a stock. Not sure that the analyst owning shares or not is pertinent. It is true that the small amount of Imp stock which trades means that movements, up or down, can be very sharp, but I am happier extrapolating from the recent trend(!). In a way it is a perfect situation for the stock to do very well, even better than the business I mean, sort of like a short squeeze or something. If Red Chris is a big deal, which it seems to be, Imp is still cheap or at last not expensive. Did you notice the new corporate brochure? It will be interesting to see q4 earnings in a couple of days. Did you read the most recent Bruce Berkowitz interview in Barrons? I hope he is right about the banks.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next