SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bill who wrote (356732)3/30/2010 6:01:13 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (2) of 793842
 
ok, but my point is what if the parents can't afford to carry the coverage....they aren't forced to carry it, are they? but *if* for example, the kid is out of college, and still hasn't found a job and his cheap student coverage is gone, what is the problem with *allowing* the parents to keep the kid on their family policy? (and as smithee said, if the kid can contribute in some way to the coverage on the parents policy, so much the better)

it is critically important to distinguish whether parents would be forced to carry the coverage for their kids as opposed to the insurers can no longer prohibit them from doing so
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News