2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 387.98

+1.3%

Nov 28 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: RJA_ who wrote (62479)	4/4/2010 7:08:01 PM
From: TH	Read Replies (1) of 218108

RJA, < Grants arguement was pretty easy to understand. I'm not sure I really understood Rosenberg. Perhaps I need to listen to it again. What was your take on what Rosenberg was saying?> We share some thoughts about this debate. I think they could both very right, but in what time frame is the question. What I found interesting is that either guy could have easily debated the other side with just one or two changes in a base assumption. Grant wins from the contrary perspective, for what he is saying is that the long cycle shift is upon us and most won't see it because of "muscle memory". That is one of the key statements I took from his side. Rosenberg makes one critical mistake. He assumes that US dominance of the global capital market continues. That is the flaw in his position, at least from my perspective. GT TH

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next