SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Alternative energy

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (7716)4/6/2010 6:04:49 PM
From: Jacob Snyder2 Recommendations  Read Replies (4) of 16955
 
Share and debt bloat in solar:

FSLR, and maybe STP, seem to be funding their manufacturing capacity additions, without increasing shares and debt at a rate faster than sales and profits are increasing. Those two companies are the only ones I found that decreased debt last year. Are there any others?

FSLR is in a class by itself, with only 146M$ of LongTerm (LT) debt.

Shares (year-end, fully diluted):
49M 2005
58M 2006 (+18%)
78.0M 2007 (+34%, the last year of rapid share expansion)
82.1M 2008 (+1.1%)
85.1M 2009 (+1.0%)
86-87M 2010 (They were the only company I looked at, which gave guidance for 2010 on share count, indicating they were the only company who had anything good to say on this issue.)

longterm debt (year-end):
49M$ 2005
81M$ 2006
108M$ 2007
198M$ 2008
175M$ 2009

Unlike all the other companies I'm reviewing here, they have no short-term debt, no convertibles, or the mysterious category of "other longterm liabilities".

1114M$ = end-2009 cash + equiv. + "marketable securities". They have more cash than anyone else.

From 2006 to 2009, sales went up 15 times, from 135M$ to 2066M$, while debt doubled, and shares increased by 47%.

STP is the next best. During 2009, shares went from 160M to 172M (7.5% increase), EPS was flat (+0.52 to +0.53, in $/ADS GAAP numbers), sales went down 12% (1.92B$ to 1.69B$). Also, they managed to decrease debt (from 1620M$ to 1488M$), and increase cash (from 508M$ to 1034M$).

TSL:
shares, EPS, end-year:
21M, $0.45, 2006
47M, $0.76, 2007
54M, $1.20, 2008
63M, $1.69, 2009
71M, $2.00, 2010 estimate
(EPS is GAAP, fully diluted shares.)
7.9M+ ADSs secondary stock offering for 2010 announced. End-2009 cash 478M$, debt 585M$. So, for the 4-year period from end-2006 through end-2010, EPS quadrupled, but shares more than tripled.

SPWRA: From 2005 to 2009, sales increased from 79M$ to 1.52B$, an impressive X19 increase, but shares went from 23M to 93M, and debt went from zero to 707M$. Just during 2009, shares increased from 84M to 93M, an 11% increase. Cash 678M$.

GAAP EPS:
2008 $1.05
2009 $0.36
2010 $0.20 (midpoint of latest guidance)
Unless earnings rebound sharply in 2011, they are going to start having trouble servicing debt.

LDK currently has debts of 1788M$, cash 454M$. Much of their debt is short-term. 4Q09 results: Gross margin was 9.9%, net loss for the fourth quarter was $7.3 million, and loss per diluted ADS was $0.07. Investors seemed to like those results (why?), because they bought LDK's secondary stock offering that raised $111M.

YGE: During 2009, shares went up from 128M to 148M (16% increase), earnings were negative (-0.48$/ADS, GAAP results) while revenue fell (1.11B$ to 1.06B$). Currently, cash is 532M$ and debt is 623M$.

Then there are the LivingDead, like ENER and ESLR.

Disclosure: 20% of my investments in FAN (wind ETF) currently, at prices $12-13. No solar holdings. I think the time to buy stocks in solar, will be when the discussion is dominated by talk of cash, cash burn, debt loads, manufacturing costs, ability to roll-over short-term debt, and which companies have viable business strategies. We're not there yet. Maybe later this year, maybe 2011.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext