A Silly Laundry Company??? Puleeze AJ! You have to be kidding! I can apperciate your desire to bring a balance to the thread but your depiction of Cyclo3pss as nothing but a "Silly Laundry Company" is comical. Obviously you wish to incite some debate on this issue which I believe you have accomplished but these ignorant remarks are not in the character of which I had initially thought of you! I KNOW that you have done DD on this company but where you are getting this slanted view of reality is beyond me! Ok then, lets take a closer look at your post.:
------
"MicroWave Technology which is essentially another spectrum of light invisible to the naked eye to used to Flash Heat & Clean the nations food supply."...
I agree. Microwaves are another spectrum of light which travel in a shorter wavelength. Microwaves essentially excite molecules causing internal heat and cooking from within. I think most of us are familiar with them. Although the net is chock full of links to research on that subject. My opinion? ... So what!
ok, now the next paragraph...
---
"Now if you people actually saw that, you'd invest in this company too, would'nt you. The fact of the matter is that many technologies exist that COULD be applied to this issue, but have not been for reasons that NO ONE on this thead is qualified to explain."
Oh Puhleeze AJ!!! Almost everyone on this thread invest all the time in growth companies like this one. The only thing is, most of us believe in the potential of ozone based technology to ultimately prevail in this field! And WHO ever professed to be qualified to explain ANYTHING? You show me where you read any post on a profession of expertise and then we will deal with that issue. Sure there are many technologies that COULD be applied, but most of us here happen to believe in this technology and I personally feel that OZON has much better odds than any of them. Sure its a "Crap Shoot" as you referred to in an earlier post. But the odds of this company to succede ultimately are much higher than any game in Vegas. How many free dice throws do you need? It is my opinion that other technologies haven't been applied yet is because the food companies will retool as needed only! They are in the business to make money and will replace equipment after depreciation. The thing is, let me draw from a similar situation so you can understand it better. Ok you have a saw, it is the best saw EVER when you bought it. Now here you are years later with your trusty hand saw, rusty now and obsolete, and you decide to go to the saw store and buy a new one. To your great suprise someone has gone and invented electricity in the interim and now you have to decide on a multitude of shiny new saws some of which are new fangled. What do you decide? well, you did make a lot of money with the old saw, and they still make that type because it HAS worked so well throughout the years but those shiny new ones are oh so tempting, despite their cost. Then you look up and see that they are having a SALE on power saws today because the saw company is new and attempting to establish a market presence. Lets say you do buy that shiny new saw and it turns out to be faster and cheaper and your customers LOVE the nice straight cuts it makes. Do you tell your friends at the country club? You betcha! And EVERYONE lives happily ever after too!
It seems to me that you need a lot of hand holding AJ, you seem to be new at the small cap game. Please don't get me wrong, I respect your intellegence I just find it a mite skewed! ... Anyway now lets deal with the next part of your post....
---
"You people should read your own posts once in a while. Granted there is a problem with out food supply, and granted that the current radiation and chlorine methods have undesireable elements. But Ozone is not some panacia that will suddenly solve all these problems, or it would have been implimented 20 years ago when they started using it for the Bottled Water industry."
Are you joshing me AJ? I find it hard to believe that this is not a feeble attempt to pull all of our chains. Or maybe you are a previously savvy but now disgruntled shorter of OZON? You really have me baffled. Surely after reading the obviously well educated posts of the fine people on this thread you can't seriously believe that we don't read our own POSTS? Puhleeeeze AJ you are insulting all of our intelligence here. THAT is not even worthy of debate! As for chlorine and radiation having undesirable elements? In my book they ARE undesirable elements. Give me oxygen as a byprduct any day of the week! My opinion? It is probably a LOT EASIER to treat water with ozone than food. I am NOT an expert in that. Anyone care to speculate as to the ozonation process? I bet we would be hard pressed to find experts to talk about this field because it is EMERGING TECHNOLOGY! AJ, If someone invented something new and the next week a bunch of guys wrote books on the invention even though they were not involved with the inventing of it would you buy the books? Probably, would you believe the books? I think you would believe them if a good majority of people did. This is not small cap thinking, this is lemming effect thinking! The investors today in OZON are NOT lemmings, they are pioneers,technical people,professionals,risk takers, etc. note I did not say gamblers. Any one who knows how to win in gambling and does their investing this way has already sold off on that last trip to 3+. Now it has built a base for another run up. The momentum investors who got caught at the high may get out on the way up, but I suspect that the price fallback has given them some time for reflection and they will hold it long now. It is not as if there is a massive float! But you know that already don't you AJ? Anyway, lets get back to the subject of your ridiculous post...
----
"The fact that the government may unite many scattered agencies may actually HURT Ozon, as we all know Lobbiests work the corridors of our government, and the Lobby that exist to support the radiation and chlorine people is potentially stronger and already entrenched, then any lobby a silly laundry company can hope to muster."
PUHLEEEEZE AJ!!! If I had not had respect for you before this retarded post I never would have responded to something as dumb as this.I am deeply saddened that you in your digging stop after only one shovelfull when treasure rarely is buried that shallow! I have not done DD on the strength of the chlorine lobby or of the irradiation lobby but do you SERIOUSLY THINK that the combined strength of them both could stand against the CLEAN AIR lobby, the FOOD SAFETY lobby, all the multitude of citizens groups etc.etc. that would stand behind any process that had a byproduct of OXYGEN? What politician would possibly be reelected? I could see it now, the press would REALLY love that! I could see the television ads now. A nice family in suburbia sitting around a table discussing who to vote for..."Honey, did you see the paper where soandso is running for election? I hear he has supported the use of chlorine and radiation in foods!" The husband replies..."I'm voting for otherguy, he wants to keep the food supply fresh and pure without poisoning it. Thank god we have an alternative!"... then the camera could pan out..."otherguy! Thinking of our childrens future"... you get the idea. AJ the thing is YOU of all people should ALREADY HAVE the idea! This is not a mutual fund where you pour your money in while some college preppies (excluding the savvy college preppies on this thread) invest your money in what they profess to be safer investments with growth potential! This is the world of SMALL CAPS!!! No hand holding should be needed here! This is RAW! This is PURE! We on this thread have reiterated our belief in OZON so many times on this thread that it has become pretty much a common belief here, and until you can IRREFUTABLY PROVE OTHERWISE, I will continue to hold and accumulate as much of this stock as I can get my hands on. If you are short on OZON I wish that I could say I feel sorry for you but I don't. The shorters will get toasted on this one IMHO.
My opinion? Ok, I dealt with the chlorine issue, I agree that the government CAN hurt the stock but probably won't and as far as OZON being a silly laundry company? I'm sure that many posts will deal in more in detail with that. I think that I'll let Amy handle that issue in a way that only a Jersey Girl could. As far as the last paragraph in your post, I think that you have crossed the line of balance and have purposely posted to incite debate which indeed you have,also indeed I have enjoyed some of your earlier posts but this one just takes the cake. In any future posts please substantiate your allegations with references to the factual data that they came from. If you want to deal with facts then LETS! If you do decide to do some actual DD on the chlorine/radiation/ozone issue, I as well as everyone here would appreciate you posting links to what you find on the OZON research thread that Brenda has so forsightedly created just for the purpose of collaborative DD. I'd go on in greater detail on these issues but then my post would be too long. I think that OZON and most of the people on this thread are a well educated and diverse group. I am proud to be a participant on this thread. I believe deeply that this stock will change many of our lives for the better forever.
Here's to posterity!
Cents |
