SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: scion who wrote (182)4/9/2010 10:05:14 AM
From: scionRead Replies (1) of 53574
 
John Bordynuik - Sorry responded too quickly. As I was adding positives about our process which simplifies permitting meant to say "We have 5 beneficial; factors that reduce the complexity of permits:"

Posted by: mikeo56 Date: Friday, April 09, 2010 10:00:12 AM
In reply to: GWMAN who wrote msg# 36310 Post # of 36323

John Bordynuik
Sorry responded too quickly. As I was adding positives about our process which simplifies permitting meant to say "We have 5 beneficial; factors that reduce the complexity of permits:"

It also important to note that our system design is highly simplified which makes documentation, operations, and permitting detail simpler.

siliconinvestor.com

Posted by: GWMAN Date: Friday, April 09, 2010 9:27:42 AM
In reply to: None Post # of 36313

From JB's FB:

Question from Tom:

Will permits and licences be ready to go when P2O is? If they are not will this be a major road block for P2O roll out? Is each State different? With proper filtering in place will permits even be necessary?

Responde from John Bordynuik:

Hello Tom. "Will permits and licences be ready to go when P2O is?"

For the state of NY, yes. For other states we will seek the assistance of URS. Our FL P2O management team has used URS many times in the past for permitting for their projects.

"If they are not will this be a major road block for P2O roll out?"

I don't see it as a major road block. ... See MoreWe have 3 thinks going for us: 1) The process does not pollute. 2) We are not handling hazardous waste material (medical waste is a different category) 3) Our residue can go in landfill 4) Our system is close-looped (as you will see at the AGM) so we have no wste water and 5) our emissions do not pollute***

"Is each State different?"

Yes. That is the reason for URS.

"With proper filtering in place will permits even be necessary?"

I believe what will shock the hell out of you at the AGM is that our 20 ton processor does NOT have or require a scrubber on its stack No filters. I do want to point out this is for processing unwashed non-hazardous mixed plastic waste. Medical waste is a totally different situation and we would need filters.
22 minutes ago

siliconinvestor.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News