SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sdgla who wrote (16526)4/9/2010 4:08:57 PM
From: John Koligman  Read Replies (1) of 42652
 
Also, as I posted to you before, I don't know why you are so upset at the bottom 50%. The top is getting away with the lowest rates in decades as they rake in huge amounts of income...

To: Sdgla who wrote (15452) 3/25/2010 7:49:05 PM
From: John Koligman 2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) of 16528

Facts prove me wrong on what? I said your 'financially fortunate' should pay more than lower INCOME folks. You have a problem with that? Those at the top have pulled way ahead as the middle class struggles.

TOP 400 Earners in U.S Averaged $345 Million in 2007, IRS Says

Ryan J. Donmoyer Ryan J. Donmoyer – Thu Feb 18, 12:00 am ET
Feb. 18 (Bloomberg) -- The 400 highest-earning U.S. households reported an average of $345 million in INCOME in 2007, up 31 percent from a year earlier, IRS statistics show.

The average TAX rate for the households fell to the lowest in almost 20 years.

The figures for 2007, the last year of an economic expansion, show that the average INCOME reported by the TOP 400 earners more than doubled from $131.1 million in 2001. That year, Congress adopted TAX cuts urged by then-President George W. Bush that Democrats say disproportionately benefits the wealthy.

Each household in the TOP 400 of earners paid an average TAX rate of 16.6 percent, the lowest since the agency began tracking the data in 1992, the Internal Revenue Service statistics show. Their average effective TAX rate was about half the 29.4 percent in 1993, the first year of President Bill Clinton’s administration, when taxes were increased.

The statistics underscore “two long-term trends: that INCOME at the very TOP has exploded and their taxes have been cut dramatically,” said Chuck Marr, director of FEDERAL TAX policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a Washington research group that supports increasing taxes on high-INCOME individuals.

The TOP 400 earners received a total $138 billion in 2007, up from $105.3 billion a year earlier. On an inflation-adjusted basis, their average INCOME grew almost fivefold since 1992, the data show.

Political Ammunition

The data may provide ammunition for President Barack Obama and Democrats led by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California who say they intend to increase the capital gains TAX rate and let TAX rates for the highest earners increase in 2011.

Almost three-quarters of the highest earners’ INCOME was in capital gains and dividends taxed at a 15 percent rate set as part of Bush-backed TAX cuts in 2003, the statistics show. Of the 400 earners, 289 paid a total effective FEDERAL TAX rate of 20 percent or less in 2007, the last year for which figures were available, the data show.

Bill Ahern, director of policy and communications for the TAX Foundation, a Washington research group that advocates lower taxes, said the 2007 data doesn’t reflect the current economic circumstances.

“In a good year like 2007, it’s not surprising to see that the owners and managers of the nation’s largest firms made a fortune,” Ahern said. “Notice that two-thirds of their 2007 INCOME was in capital gains, which have dropped like a rock since then.”

The data were first reported by TAX.com, a blog run by Virginia publisher TAX Analysts.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext