MarkS, you really know how to lose more of your credibility don't you! My pricing example was in response to a post who questioned pricing pressures in the mainstream market, because insurance was paying 70%. But you conviently left that out didn't you. The reason, I feel VVUS will lose the mainstream is because of costs, and ease of use. Thus all my pricing examples are valid. Get it yet, or do you have a learning disability?
I have also said numerous times, that if the remaining niche, grows faster than the market share loss, VVUS would be okay, but that I don't think this is how it will play out.
There is nothing VOO DOO about this, except your fascination with me, and your failure to come up with a solid and detailed bull argument, and POST it on this thread for all to examine, as I have with my short position. Is it a lack of courage, or knowledge on your part, that you fail to do this?
I have also posted, that apparently Viagra can cause erections in men who have never had them for several years,(one definition of Chronic, per DB,) as this is how Viagra was discovered in treating heart patients, and I will post more definitive information as I receive it. I have also asked you and DB, how big is this market? To date you have not answered.
You are also incorrect and misleading with your comment, " the "niche" consists of all chronic impotent men who can't be helped by Viagra.)" This simply is not accurate or factual. You need to do more homework, read posts more carefully, and think before you ramble, ahh, type. I'll see if you can discover your errors in this statement. (But I really don't care.)
I will though mail you a Voo Doo doll of myself so you can feel better about yourself by sticking pins in it. Just post your address.
Good Sticking, LF |
