<No, I said I think others have as much ability there as I do.>
OK, but then they have the ability to (judge) and know that the God they learned about made no sense... that was the point.
<If you say I know Dawkins better than you why are you disputing me?>
I'm not "disputing".... I'm saying that based on the way you treat my discourse, it looks to me like you are projecting your hatred onto Dawkins. Further, hatred is a "feeling", so I'm assuming you'd have to know him personally or seen him speak about the topic to judge this... but I dunno, I suppose his writings may expose that... got links?
<And thats what I base my opinion on.>
Right... got links? There must be some very convoluted reasoning if he writes in (a state of) hatred.
Further to this, my basic premise when speaking about Dawkins is to speak to atheism, ie. I see where atheists can reasonably deny the existance of (their version of) God.
<Wait, you've been saying you weren't interested. Now you want more info? >
I'm not intrested in Dawkins "intellectual argument", but if you want to insist he's "hateful"... for me to believe that I'd have to see it... given your consistant pattern of changing MY OWN meanings and communications to fit YOUR ideas... I (of course) assume you do it to him.
I'll read the link later, and get back to you. :))
In the mean time, have you FINALLY looked up "sympathy"... or?
DAK |
