SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John Carragher who wrote (359207)4/13/2010 7:48:24 AM
From: alanrs  Read Replies (2) of 793958
 
Not necessarily. The type of construction they are apparently describing is called post tensioning. Steel cables (in greasy plastic sheaths) with 'shoes' on each end are rolled out with the rebar. After the concrete is poured, but before it fully cures, those cables are stretched and locked in place, compressing the concrete. Concrete is strong in compression but weak in tension. By compressing it in this manner it can be used in applications that involve tension, such as floors, which I'm reasonably sure is the case here. If the ends were not properly sealed and water was rusting out the locks (actually a couple of steel wedges at the cable/shoe interface) the cables could slip, releasing the compression on the slab.

I'm a little surprised that water would get to this area once the skin is on, but it is Seattle. The crew that tensions the cables is often different from the crew that cuts the excess cable which is often different from the crew who would 'paint' the ends which is always different from the crew who would fill in the pocket with grout. Obviously, something fell through the cracks, but it need not have been nefarious.

ARS
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext