A US National Health Care System? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: RetiredNow who wrote (16737)	4/13/2010 3:20:42 PM
From: TimF	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 42652

as the chart below shows No it doesn't. Some of the factors aren't broken down by administration. "Deficit without these factors", does not equal "deficit without Bush policies", of those that are ("Bush era tax cuts") or where its implied (the wars) - 1 - The tax cuts - Static projections of tax cuts overestimate the revenue loss. 2 - The wars - Obama increased the force and activity level in Afghanistan. Also he has the ability to reduce the cost if he chose to do so. At this point the cost is largely on him, or at least it will be in the out years on the chart. I support the extra effort in Afghanistan, but you can't simply give the category of the the wars to Bush. You also cn't give the stimulus, "TARP, Fannie and Freddie", or the downturn. Beyond that the chart doesn't take in to account increased entitlement spending, which has been the main driver of spending, and thus deficits. And it ignore ways in which Obama has, or plans to, increase spending. Bush bought us past $3tril, Obama will bring us past $4tril. Neither can escape blame for the deficits by laying it on the other person.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next