SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The coming US dollar crisis

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: benwood who wrote (28057)4/16/2010 11:45:33 AM
From: zamboz3 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) of 71475
 
GS charged with fraud
washingtonpost.com
SEC accuses Goldman Sachs of civil fraud

By Zachary A. Goldfarb
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, April 16, 2010; 11:23 AM

The Securities and Exchange Commission filed charges Friday against Goldman Sachs, one of the most successful but vilified banks on Wall Street, for misleading and defrauding investors in selling a financial product based on subprime mortgages.

In filing the civil suit against Goldman Sachs, the agency is targeting one of the banks that largely escaped the wreckage of the financial crisis and, with the help of various forms of government aid, emerged stronger.

The SEC's suit strikes at a practice that was one of the main causes of the financial crisis: the creation of poisonous investments derived from home loans made to borrowers who couldn't afford the houses they were buying.

The suit also drags into a legal maelstrom Paulson & Co., the firm of legendary hedge fund manager John Paulson, who made billions of dollars by betting against the housing market in the years before it went bust. He and his firm have not been accused of wrongdoing.

Goldman Sachs had no immediate comment. Paulson & Co. also had no immediate comment.

In this case, the SEC alleges that Goldman Sachs created and marketed a financial product known as a collateralized debt obligation, often referred to as a CDO, whose value was linked to that of home loans. The SEC says the bank failed to tell investors important information about the investment -- in particular that Paulson & Co. played a central role in helping Goldman assemble the CDO while the hedge fund at the same time placed bets that the CDO would lose value.

"The product was new and complex but the deception and conflicts are old and simple," said Robert Khuzami, chief Director of the Division of Enforcement. "Goldman wrongly permitted a client that was betting against the mortgage market to heavily influence which mortgage securities to include in an investment portfolio, while telling other investors that the securities were selected by an independent, objective third party."

The suit, filed in federal court in Southern District of New York, alleges that Paulson & Co. paid Goldman Sachs to create a product which would allow the firm to bet against subprime mortgage securities it believed would lose value.

The bank created the CDO, which was known as ABACUS 2007-AC1, and began to market it to investors who wanted to bet that the housing and subprime mortgage would continue to boom.

But, according to the SEC, the bank didn't tell investors that Paulson & Co. had helped formulate the CDO by encouraging the purchase of subprime mortgages that would likely lose value.

The SEC alleges that a Goldman Sachs vice president, Fabrice Tourre, was principally responsible for putting together the CDO. He also faces civil charges.

According to the SEC, the CDO was created on April 26, 2007, just as the housing market began to falter. Paulson & Co. paid Goldman Sachs $15 million for structuring and marketing the CDO. Investors in the CDO lost more than $1 billion, according to the agency.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext