Actually Dawkins claims that parents who teach religion to their children are the moral equivalent of pedophiles. Why you choose to defend this idea I don't know.
* All physicists that "speculate" about "multiple universes" do so because they are denying the obvious "God" alternative.
First, the obvious alternative is design. Everyone will think of the designer as God though. And yes, that science can choose between a "finetuner" and a multiverse was in fact the explicitly stated THEME of the article I posted. Not something I'm making up.
* Believing in a compassionate loving god is some type of copout to get away from retribution from Brummar's God.
Let me point out that you've effectively claimed that God doesn't hold anyone accountable for their actions, even as I pointed out, Hitler, Stalin and Pol Pot. Refusing to judge people who do great harm would be unloving to their victims.
* Science is a secret Cabal hiding God and promoting atheism.
No, but a lot of atheists think so. Check out PZ Myers phyrangula site.
* "Global Warming" is also propagated by the above...
No, its another set of con-men pushing the catastrophic anthropegenic global warming idea.
* Scientists that create GMO products are exempt from the above, because they worship at the corporate alter.
Not necessarily. GMO products might be good or bad. You seem to think that because a profit-seeking business is involved it must be evil.
* People have the inherent ability to know the ultimate truth and know right from wrong... but for some reason only Brummar and people who agree with him excercise that right... presumably every one else is evil.
I believe all men are sinful. You believe no men are sinful .... except for those seeking profit, or believing in the wrong non-judmental God, or being conservative, .....
* And if you go far enough back, the only person EVER persecuted by the Catholic Church is Galileo.
No, the only persecuted by the Catholic church for a scientific finding. |
