Alternative energy Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Alternative energy

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Cy B who wrote (7893)	4/21/2010 11:06:48 AM
From: Jacob Snyder	Read Replies (1) of 16955

re TAN and FAN: I think both are actively managed, and charge a 0.60%/y fee for their (so far) inferior results. I don't follow TAN, since I don't own it and don't intend to. FAN (which I own at prices 12-13$) has been shifting out of turbine-makers, and incrementally moving into utilities (wind park owners). I'm guessing this is a defensive measure, to lessen losses, but it means that when the sector takes off, FAN will probably underperform. I use FAN, because many of the companies in this sector are small and European (although increasingly Asian). Either their stocks aren't available, or they don't report using US GAAP, or very little news is available about them. I am not aware of any wind or solar index ETFs that just track the sector without trying to pick stocks. If there are any, I'd prefer them.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next