SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cymer (CYMI)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jess Beltz who wrote (8383)11/5/1997 8:14:00 PM
From: Peter V  Read Replies (1) of 25960
 
You guys are missing Emile's point. His theory is the bond holders shorted the stock, which doesn't cost anything but commissions. Then, like all shorts, they hope the price drops so they can buy back the stock at a lower price, thereby making money, without touching their convertibles. The convertibles were just a backup in case the stock rose ABOVE $47. In such a case they could cover for $47. Emile said this in his post: They do not cover their short positions by converting their bonds. They cover their short positions by buying in the panicked and disoriented market. The conversion of the convertible bonds are a backup in case the plan failed--which was virtually impossible. I'm not necessarily agreeing with Emile's theory that the bond holders are the shorts, but I think it's at least plausible, and you guys were misinterpreting his theory. Can't we all just get along .... ???
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext