You are just a little bundle of over-generalizations and contradictions , aren't you? Here are your words:
"Longies usually," "most shorts." "with the few exceptions," have only seen a few of them materialize" (previously I believe you said one or two times, next time will we be up to "several?") You just don't get it, IPM is an exception, I already described one squeeze to you, this will be next.
<<I already stated where I feel safe selling>> Exactly, yet you feel you can lambast me for not averaging down, fine, reveal your hypocrisy for all to see
<<yea, I'm a 35 year old kid, only I play with my own computer>> parental warning: Too much Nintendo, and this is how your kid turns out
<<and thanks to my attorneys (that are obviously more intelligent than you) have made enought to retire at 35, far ahead of them>>
I'm sure they are more intelligent than me, but I hope their grammar is better than yours...anyway, we are all dutifully impressed that your attorneys made you rich, it obviously had nothing to do with your abilities, although given your prior post to me (re: attorneys conning money) they must have charged you quite a bit.
What I see is an overgrown kid who wants to be perceived as a "player," as a sophisticated "trader" who has learned how the "big money" is made, i.e. by playing the short side. The question is, are you a "pro" shorter or a "moronic" one? I quote the words of another shortie, one who is actually a professional moron, or is it a moronic professional, Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Goodnight, Otter |
